[WikiEN-l] Bible websites

[Magnus Manske]

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Charles
> Matthews<charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, why is a Wikipedia article citing a Bible verse?
>
> Because in spite of their dominant representation, its the Wikipedia
> and not the Atheistpedia.

Come to think of it:

The bible is either wrong, in which case it shouldn't be cited.

Or it's true, which would mean that it was dictated by God himself.
Wouldn't that make it original research?

/me ducks