[WikiEN-l] Notability and Fiction

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 7/1/2009 5:05:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
andrewrturvey at googlemail.com writes:

You're  suggesting that [[WP:FICT]] and presumably other specific 
guidelines should be  allowed to depart from the central guideline which would just 
become a default  guideline to be applied where a subsidiary guideline 
doesn't exist?  >>
---------------
 
A little while ago I was reading through our article on the list of Outer  
Limits episodes and I noticed a tag at the top that I'd not seen before.   
It said something like that the source itself is not generally considered  
sufficient for an article.  Thinking about that more, it's a bit odd.
 
For a person, you can't interview them and then write up their biography,  
but let's say you watched an Outer Limits episode.  It states who the  
actors were, what the title was, you can write a generally simply and bland  
overview of the plot.  It's a primary source, but surely you are merely  
*describing* the source, you are not interpreting it.
 
_http://knol.google.com/k/chair-potato/chairpotato-presents-outer-limits/hyu
jx7mco9jp/4_ 
(http://knol.google.com/k/chair-potato/chairpotato-presents-outer-limits/hyujx7mco9jp/4) #
 
 
Will Johnson
 
 
 
**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the 
grill. (http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005)