[WikiEN-l] To boldy delete what no one had deleted before!

[Alvaro García]

Stubs aren't bad. They may be about a topic which doesn't have many  
information.


--
Alvaro

On 14-01-2009, at 12:57, Ken Arromdee <arromdee at rahul.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 wjhonson at aol.com wrote:
>> I am sorry I still do not get it.
>> 1) Is your proposal going to completely hide "unfinished" articles  
>> from
>> the
>> public? If so who will be able to see them? Admins? Users?>>
>>
>> To hide those articles which are unfinished, or which the community  
>> has
>> decided are unfinished.  So the AfD process becomes simply the  
>> "Hide It
>> process" much less contentious.
>
> You didn't answer the question about who gets to see them.
>
> Given most possible answers to this question, it'll just end up  
> being the same
> as AFD.  After all, right now an admin can see a deleted article.
>
>> <<3) Isn't your proposal hiding all stubs as well as some other
>> articles?
>> After all no stub by very definition is ready for "public
>> consumption".>>
>>
>> No.  It has nothing to do with stubs or non-stubs.  Stubs are  
>> published
>> today, and they would be published tomorrow.  The only thing this  
>> does
>> is provide a way for AfD to turn into something with less conflict.
>
> Well, is it about hiding articles ready for public consumption, or  
> isn't it?
> If it is, stubs get hidden.  If it's not, you shouldn't say it is.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l