[WikiEN-l] NOR contradicts NPOV

[WJhonson at aol.com]

<<In a message dated 1/7/2009 1:43:54 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
saintonge at telus.net writes:

The real  contributors function best in the topics that 
interest them, and if  they're lucky they'll avoid the wrath of some 
autocratic know-nothing that  wants to impose the literal interpretation 
of obscure policy.

If  you do not find primary sources acceptable that's fine; don't use 
them in  your own writing.  That does not justify your dictating such a  
semantic distinction on others.>>
 
No organization can function with only fingers and no arms.
"...do not find primary sources acceptable" has nothing whatsoever to do  
with my position or with policy.
And "your dictating" is a situation that does not exist. "Semantic  
distinction" sounds a bit off-hand since most writers do use the terms "primary  
source" and "secondary source".
 
I have never dictated my opinion upon others.
Perhaps you would want to read the thread again, from the beginning and see  
why this line of thrust is not relevant.
 
Will Johnson
 
 
 
**************New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026)