[WikiEN-l] Civility poll results

[Emily Monroe]

>> I think the same thing applies to our civility policy.  If we want  
>> it to be respected, we have to start blocking people if they refer  
>> to another user as a "cunt", no matter what the provocation.
>
> Do this and you've suddenly made provocation a lot more profitable  
> for the provoker.

Like I said before, both the provoker and provokee need to be blocked.  
Prefrebly, the provoker would actually get a longer block, with less  
chances to "start over". We don't accept BAITing, after all.

Emily
On Aug 12, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Ken Arromdee wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Surreptitiousness wrote:
>> I think the same thing applies to
>> our civility policy.  If we want it to be respected, we have to start
>> blocking people if they refer to another user as a "cunt", no matter
>> what the provocation.
>
> Do this and you've suddenly made provocation a lot more profitable  
> for the
> provoker.
>
> There's a reason why zero tolerance policies are considered unjust  
> in real
> life by just about everyone who's thought about them.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l