[WikiEN-l] More fair use image overreaching

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 3/2/2008 4:37:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
dgerard at gmail.com writes:

Mind  you, I suspect 200 a day or 1000 a day or whatever (I would
*guess* the  latter is getting close to the rate of crap uploads, but
anyway) would lead  to *more* deletion, as the backlog is much  more
human-reviewable.>>


------------------------------------
By the way, I believe BC has already implemented, or  said-he-would-implement 
a limit on the tagging rate.
 
And I have no problem with more deletion, provided there is a  reasonable 
time spent in human review.
 
However I, and others, expressed concern, that this was unlikely given the  
extreme back load.  When deletions take place, for a single admin, at the  rate 
of 50 per minute, we can guarantee that reasonable review was not  done.  
That is what we want to avoid going forward yes.
 
But in addition, some of the deletions which *were* done, now need to be  
reviewed and undone, as being probable borderline  cases.



**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.      
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)