[WikiEN-l] BADSITES ArbCom case about to close

[Ken Arromdee]

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 fredbaud at waterwiki.info wrote:
> > But it still gives free reign to remove links to attack sites that are
> > used in discussing an attack sites policy.  It also allows the situation where
> > a user is accused of posting on an attack site and is not allowed to give
> > links to show that what he posted was innocuous.
> > Please do not republish personal attacks.
> I don't see how that's in any way responsive to what I said.  Are you trying
> to tell me that someone defending himself by saying "this is an innocuous
> link", or someone arguing on an attack site policy discussion page, is
> republishing personal attacks?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> If the link is to a personal attack, it should not be republished. Depends on what's on the other end.

So you don't think there's anything wrong with linking to the site, as long
as the link itself doesn't go to an attack?