[WikiEN-l] Is Slate an attack site?

[Anthony]

On 10/11/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Nobody is seriously suggesting that Brandt, Bagley, or any other
> nutjob running an attack site be taken seriously. But we can do a
> better job of confronting them than removing all links to them. If
> somebody who is smart enough and respected enough to write the
> headline story for Slate can fall for Brandt's shit, it's probably
> time for us to wake up and realize that Brandt is pretty good at what
> he does, and needs a response beyond censorship.
>

I think you should consider that and then consider apologizing for
calling me a troll because I've taken Brandt seriously.

If Brandt is full of shit, prove it.  Feel free to do this privately
if you'd like.