[WikiEN-l] Is Slate an attack site?

[James Farrar]

On 11/10/2007, fredbaud at waterwiki.info <fredbaud at waterwiki.info> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Farrar [mailto:james.farrar at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 04:29 PM
> To: 'English Wikipedia'
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Is Slate an attack site?
>
> On 11/10/2007, fredbaud at waterwiki.info <fredbaud at waterwiki.info> wrote:
>
> >> Right, and that is where "the idiot" should have to look for it. It is >>inappropriate to trash
> >> our own users on our own site.
>
> >This is not seriously in dispute, as far as I can tell.
>
> That is exactly what is in dispute.

No, it really isn't.

What is in dispute is whether linking to a non-attack page on a site
which also has attack pages counts as "trashing our own users on our
own site".

What is also in dispute is the subjective manner in which potential
"attack sites" are assessed.