[WikiEN-l] Arbiter involvement on the Durova affair

[jayjg]

On Nov 30, 2007 10:21 AM, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 30/11/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:14 -0500, "Alec Conroy"
> > > <alecmconroy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >Despite participating in the lists and receiving the "evidence" email,
> > > >no arbiter has agreed yet agreed to recuse themselves.  Flonight and
> > > >Morven are currently the deciding votes in a  split-decision at the
> > > >Arbcom case proposing to ban Giano for 90 days for revealing the
> > > >evidence that exonerated !!.
> >
> > > The arbitrators *already had* that evidence, there was no need for
> > > Giano to post anything.
> >
> >
> > Indeed. Giano appears to have primarily been going for making a big
> > splash, i.e. drama-queening.
> >
> >
> > - d.
>
>
> David and Guy, both Paul August (in the ANI subpage) and Mackensen (on the
> Proposed Decisions talk page) have stated that Arbcom did *not* receive a
> copy of the list post; it appears that many members of Arbcom first saw
> Durova's post when Giano published it on ANI.

The Arbitration Committee list was forwarded a copy of the list post
with the express permission of Durova *well before* Giano posted it to
AN/I.