[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[Kwan Ting Chan]

On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:38 -0500, jayjg wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 2:22 AM, Relata Refero <refero.relata at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You have completely ignored the tone of the "report", the clear
> > statement that the 'evidence' is a demonstration not merely that !! is
> > a returning editor, but that !! is one of 'them' who share information
> > from a 'playbook' on how to disrupt WP. I can only assume you have
> > either not yet read it, or that you have read it and are still unable
> > to see that most people who read it more than cursorily will
> > understand that the clear implication is that !! is blockworthy.
> 
> Oddly enough, while this implication is obvious to you, people who are
> actually on the list have stated quite clearly that they saw no reason
> to think Durova was going to block !!, and, apparently, no-one else on
> the list did either. This has also been the impression of unrelated
> individuals reading this discussion, in this very thread. It appears
> that, as I stated before, the view that it is "obvious" that Durova
> was planning to block !! 15 days after she posted that e-mail is based
> on hindsight, bad faith, and circular reasoning.

Where the hell did bad faith come in in the above discussion???

-- 
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
  - Heinrich Heine
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20071130/05282b82/attachment.pgp