[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[Guy Chapman aka JzG]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:45:48 -0500, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>
wrote:

>I guess I can't.  Is the point you're arguing about that "Durova"
>merely discussed "the investigation" with five people, and not "the
>block"?  Because if so, I don't see the difference.  The mere fact
>that she discussed that twisted "investigation" with people is enough
>for us to ask for more information.

Which you have been given.

Durova discussed the information - and the result was that people
agreed this was undoubtedly not a new user.  This is now established
as undisputed fact.  It's also pretty clear that they were pitching
for adminship.  What was missing was (a) any evidence of wrongdoing
and (b) and indication that Durova  was intending to block.

What you need here is Hanlon's Razor.

Guy (JzG)
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG