[WikiEN-l] Radical redefinition of OR

[Slim Virgin]

On 3/20/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The text that Jimbo removed was OR. Using lots of different primary
> > sources to support what you are saying is generally OR.
>
> That is going to come as a bit of a shock to the authors of [[Biaxial nematic]].
>
That article isn't based on primary sources that I can see.