[WikiEN-l] Radical redefinition of OR

geni geniice at gmail.com
Tue Mar 20 17:51:40 UTC 2007


On 3/20/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> The text that Jimbo removed was OR. Using lots of different primary
> sources to support what you are saying is generally OR.

That is going to come as a bit of a shock to the authors of [[Biaxial nematic]].

-- 
geni



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list