[WikiEN-l] Conservapedia

[Oskar Sigvardsson]

On 3/7/07, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually they don't seem to define what their counterpart to NPOV is.
> For example, is it ok to have an article which states all the horrible
> things that communists have done, and none of the horrible things
> Americans have done? In any normal, even "conservative" encyclopaedia,
> this would still be a glaring omission. If you don't define some kind
> of bounds or some central position, the whole thing just becomes
> propaganda or worse.

Seriously people, it's called Conservapedia! What do you expect, a
balanced and neutral look at the world? I mean, any time you name
something after a political movement, it's going to be biased. I'm not
going to be that trusting of the
sushi-eating-cappucino-drinking-homosexual-academic-liberal-hollywood-elite-pedia
either, at least not on stuff like religious topics (even though that
particular tomb would describe me as a person fairly well ;).

--Oskar