[WikiEN-l] Is editing for payment a fundamentally problematic conflict of...

[Bartning at aol.com]

In a message dated 3/4/2007 2:31:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
guy.chapman at spamcop.net writes:

All of  which is, as you have been told numerous times, COMPLETELY
IRRELEVANT  because when YOU write  about it YOU have a conflict  of
interest.  Is that so very hard to understand?  That is not a  judgment
on the merit of your organisation, it's about the appropriateness  of
YOU adding links to it and YOU adding content about it.

And that,  I think, had better be my last word on the subject, at least
on this  list.



Anyone who takes it properly can see the how you don't cite Wikipedia  policy 
properly.  Besides your shouting, you say I can't write about a  topic that 
interests me because of an inappropriate claim of a conflict of  interest.  
It's worse than telling someone he can't write in a  Wikipedia entry about him 
because it's not an autobiography.  It's  like saying a father who has lost a 
son to a drunk driver can't talk  about drunk driving on Wikipedia.
 
I feel attacked here.  I can't block and don't have a clear view  on how to 
involve WP:Arbitration but want help with it.  I want  help in the situation as 
I have been unfairly treated, blocked unfairly,  and an article I care about 
has been vandalized by Wikipedia definitions as  a result of ignorance.
 
Vincent
UN:John Wallace Rich
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.