[WikiEN-l] WP:ATT

[Steve Bennett]

On 3/1/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> It looks like some kind of semantic game.  Capable of being attributed?
> It suggests that we don't need to make an attribution, only assert that
> it is possible.  Actually attributed statements (or attributions) are
> then verifiable.

This has been current practice for a long time. Anyone claiming (as
Jimbo periodically does) that every statement actually has to be
directly or indirectly referenced is not being realistic.

Steve