[WikiEN-l] Admins shouldn't shoot back

[Marc Riddell]

on 6/19/07 9:17 PM, Gracenotes at wikigracenotes at gmail.com wrote:

> I am aware that my paragraph is somewhat out of context, and is
> more meant as a general response to the so-called "culture" for which
> you've recently been advocating. But it's a piece of satire (so, like A
> Modest Proposal, it naturally employs hyperbole), and I hope to heaven
> that you realize that. Or else I shall get a wall to bang my head against.
> (Figuratively.) It's meant to intellectually stoke things up, to get people
> to *think* about things; I have talked to some editors who have indicated
> that they sense the atmosphere in some parts of Wikipedia discourages
> original thinking about extra-content situations. Now, if you can identify
> why I think this culture is a bad idea, congratulations, you're off to a
> super start! (Or you can claim to be confused.)
> 
> Cheers,
> Gracenotes

Gracenotes,

I liked what you wrote, and knew from which perspective you were writing. I
had no problem figuring out the angle or true meaning of your message. I
encourage you to keep writing; letting your instincts, values, and personal
ethics guide you. In short: I like your style!

Whereas, I agree somewhat with Ray's belief in a need for caution when
writing; I would like to offer another perspective on the use of such
caution in communication: Too much of it, or a preoccupation with it, can
lead to no communication at all ­ except dishonest, deceptive,
politically-correct mush.

Satire is tricky to write, just ask the "Saturday Night Live" or "The Daily
Show" writers; its purpose is to poke fun at something or someone, as well
as to call attention to a social and/or political issue; to preach to the
choir (that's how you get them to sing) as well as to those not yet
converted. But one thing for sure - you're going to piss someone off in the
process. And, if that happens, to write honestly, that needs to be OK with
you.

Know your intent. If that intent is to teach - expect what you are teaching
to be challenged. If that intent is to inflame - expect a conflagration. If
that intent is to do harm ­ expect to be called to account for it. If that
intent is to communicate your truth ­ expect their truth in return. The
burden of truth and understanding in any form of communication must be
shared equally between the two parties. If I liked what you said, I'll tell
you; if I didn't ­ I'll do the same.

If we are to have a creative, free-thinking, reasonably intelligent,
articulate culture within Wikipedia, can we ask or expect anything less?

Marc Riddell

-- 
Talk is no substitute for action, but in a rational society it must exist as
a prelude to it.