[WikiEN-l] Editing with open proxies

[Gabe Johnson]

On 6/17/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/17/07, James Farrar <james.farrar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/17/07, James Farrar <james.farrar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Not nearly as simple as the theory that he/she knew editing from
> > proxies
> > > > was
> > > > > against policy.
> > > >
> > > > Once again: Evidence?
> > >
> > >
> > > James, you can't keep throwing up convoluted theories without any
> > evidence
> > > whatsoever, and then challenge others for evidence when they present
> > much
> > > simpler ones.
> >
> > Jay:
> >
> > Mine is not a convoluted theory; it simply assumes good faith and poor
> > judgement.
>
>
> And ignorance. It's convoluted.
>
> You are proposing a theory that does not, on the face of it, assume
> > good faith, hence it is imperative that you provide evidence for it.
>
>
> I had no theory when I asked the question, which is why I asked it.
>
>
> That you fail to do so weighs against you.
>
>
> You're really not in a position to make that kind of judgement.
>
>
> And here are two more questions you still haven't answered: you
> > apparently knew some time ago that CharlotteWebb was violating NOP.
> > How long ago did you know, and why did you wait until she was
> > nominated for Administrator before bringing it up?
>
>
> I've actually answered the second question elsewhere, but why does it
> matter?

Because otherwise, it makes it look like you are trying to
systematically reduce the number of RFAs. If you have answered it
before, please kindly do so again for our benefit. Thank you. ~~~~

-- 
Absolute Power
C^7rr8p£5 ab£$^u7£%y