[WikiEN-l] A narrower concept of boldness

[John Lee]

On 6/7/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/7/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You should see the crap people have tried to pull with IAR. Would I be
> > right in guessing off the tp of my head that the people trying to make
> > "be bold" more timid have previously failed to add subclauses and
> > riders to IAR?
>
> Nah be bold has always been a lot more timid than certain people
> appear to think (hasn't mattered for the most part since most people
> only edit articles).
>
> Subclauses on IAR are irrelevant since there should never be any need
> to cite IAR.


Huh? Then why do we have IAR in the first place? Citing it is terribly
useful when confronted with people who follow policies to the letter without
using their good judgment.

Johnleemk