[WikiEN-l] A narrower concept of boldness

[geni]

On 6/7/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> You should see the crap people have tried to pull with IAR. Would I be
> right in guessing off the tp of my head that the people trying to make
> "be bold" more timid have previously failed to add subclauses and
> riders to IAR?

Nah be bold has always been a lot more timid than certain people
appear to think (hasn't mattered for the most part since most people
only edit articles).

Subclauses on IAR are irrelevant since there should never be any need
to cite IAR.

-- 
geni