[WikiEN-l] [name of rouge adnim here]

[James Farrar]

On 03/06/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/3/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
> > And as several of us have been saying over and over, the GFDL vio is not
> > "clear" in this case and for much of the material can be rectified with
> > a little more work.
> >
>
> Your problem appears to be that you don't know the GFDL that well.

In your opinion.