[WikiEN-l] Metapedia - worse than Conservapedia

[Thomas Dalton]

> It would furthermore be quite legitimate to say that Encycopaedia Britannica
> falls well short of the requirements of neutrality that Wikipedia sets
> for itself.
> And yet that does not allow us to point a finger at Encyclopaedia Britannica and
> say that their compendium is a ridiculous endeavour.

That's never stopped us before...