[WikiEN-l] The Register decries Wikipedia's "censorship" via OTRS

[Ray Saintonge]

That was hardly my point.  There was never any suggestion of abandoning 
NPOV.  How do you get that from a call for statistical information?  
Suggesting that no-one who makes an OTRS complaint is ever successful 
stretches credibility. 

Ec

Jimmy Wales wrote:

>I think the answer, throughout the entire history of Wikipedia, is 0%  
>"capitulation".
>
>NPOV is non-negotiable.  As ever.
>
>On Jul 8, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
>  
>
>>Kat Walsh wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>A lot of people say that every time they hear about OTRS it's because
>>>of some big frustrating action. This is largely because the small
>>>undramatic actions or the ones where the people writing are told
>>>"sorry, we don't do that" -- or the ones where people get into tense
>>>20-message exchanges that amount to "sorry, we don't do that" -- no
>>>one hears about those.
>>>      
>>>
>>Would it be feasible to periodically publish OTRS statistics?   
>>Something
>>that appears, for example,  as 80% refusal, 19% negotiation, 1%
>>capitulation could give a clearer picture.
>>