[WikiEN-l] The Register decries Wikipedia's "censorship" via OTRS

[Jimmy Wales]

I think the answer, throughout the entire history of Wikipedia, is 0%  
"capitulation".

NPOV is non-negotiable.  As ever.

On Jul 8, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:

> Kat Walsh wrote:
>
>> A lot of people say that every time they hear about OTRS it's because
>> of some big frustrating action. This is largely because the small
>> undramatic actions or the ones where the people writing are told
>> "sorry, we don't do that" -- or the ones where people get into tense
>> 20-message exchanges that amount to "sorry, we don't do that" -- no
>> one hears about those.
>>
> Would it be feasible to periodically publish OTRS statistics?   
> Something
> that appears, for example,  as 80% refusal, 19% negotiation, 1%
> capitulation could give a clearer picture.
>
> Ec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>