[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"on attack site link policy

[Fred Bauder]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: William Pietri [mailto:william at scissor.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 6, 2007 12:53 PM
>To: 'English Wikipedia'
>Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkkkkkkkkkk site link policy
>
>Fred Bauder wrote:
>> I'll never accept linking to personal attacks on Wikipedians. I don't care how futile it is considered to be or how bad such "censorship" is. And it a site makes a regular business of attacking Wikipedians, not criticizing, but attacking, I will oppose linking to the site at all. I can see only good coming out of supporting other editors and only harm coming out of tolerating their humiliation.
>> 
>
>I agree with the principle -- we should treasure and support our editors 
>-- but I don't think the rest follows in all cases.
>
>For example, I once linked to what could easily be read as an off-wiki 
>personal attack on me. That was very helpful, as it made the situation 
>clearer to fellow editors, and resulted in me getting the assistance I 
>needed. A blanket ban would have made my life as an editor worse, not 
>better.
>
>Rather than making the judgment based on the thing linked to, I think 
>our judgment should be based on the way we are linking. Linking to a 
>personal attack can be done as a personal attack, of course, and that 
>should be treated like any other personal attack. But it also can be a 
>way to defang the personal attack. It can be a way to show what kooks 
>the attackers are. It can shine a light on things that fester in the dark.
>
>Stepping back, links to contentious material can certainly be helpful in 
>discussing and building consensus around whatever the new do-not-link 
>policy ends up as. After some random clicking around on the sites whose 
>names should not be spoken, I still haven't seen anything particularly 
>horrific. I'm not saying it isn't there, of course. I'm just saying that 
>if some people can see a problem and others can't, they are unlikely to 
>ever come to consensus on the severity of the problem, let alone the 
>solution.
>
>William

The remedy was applied after a personal attack on MONGO was featured on the Main Page.

Fred