[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy

[Fred Bauder]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Farrar [mailto:james.farrar at gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 6, 2007 09:11 AM
>To: 'English Wikipedia'
>Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattack site link policy
>
>On 06/07/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/5/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 7/5/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Well, it's convenient that they could find another source without
>> > > having to link to the WR thread, but it also seems that the thread is
>> > > a better source, in spite of the snarky commentary within it.
>> >
>> > It can't possibly be a "better source", as none of it is reliable.
>>
>> Not even the almost blow-by-blow transcript from Brandt of his
>> communications with the various parties?
>
>No, because it's an attack site, and hence per se unreliable...

No, because it's a forum.

Fred