[WikiEN-l] "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources will be deleted."

[Ken Arromdee]

On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
> > How does that reduce the scope of the policy?
> 
> Because it says there is only a problem if the material is doubtful. An
> unsourced statement that is not challenged and not likely to be
> challenged -- and that is not libelous if untrue, I should add -- is not
> to be removed, according to WP:V.

Oh, I wish.

This still is subject to people who go around challenging random articles,
which I think is an abuse of the process.  It really ought to say "sincerely
challenged", but it doesn't...