[WikiEN-l] Admin burnout

[Ray Saintonge]

Stephen Bain wrote:

>On 2/12/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>So what if he's the most inclusionist inclusionist on the
>>project?  If we allow republicans to be sysops we should allow
>>inclusionists :-)
>>    
>>
>The "community" only wants admins who will delete whatever they decide
>to put into [[CAT:CSD]].
>  
>
>>Others who should have been promoted but were not for ridiculous
>>reasons include Stephen B Streater and Georgewilliamherbert.
>>    
>>
>This sounded like a good idea to me before, but I wouldn't be
>surprised if I'm hounded down as a cabalist: how about if any X number
>of admins think someone should have the mop, then that person gets the
>mop on a trial basis for Y amount of time, perhaps with a regular RFA
>at the end of the trial period. Adjust X and Y to taste.
>
I have no problem with bureaucrats who use common sense to override a 
negative RfA result.

Ec