[WikiEN-l] One alternative
geni
geniice at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 19:52:13 UTC 2007
On 05/12/2007, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> And in this case there was no "secret body" that "determine[d] cases",
> so "authority" was irrelevant. Odd how your comments were based on the
> false presumption that has been repudiated so often in the past few
> days. It's clear that my last comment to you about having a perfect
> record of assuming bad faith still applies.
If you are going to keep trying to play the plausible denyability card
it is to be expected that people are going to start opting for
collective responsibility.
--
geni
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list