[WikiEN-l] Citizendium's assertions about material from Wikipedia

[Gary Kirk]

Sorry, I didn't mean your answer, but Jossi reposting his/her post of
this morning just now.

On 14/04/07, Andries Krugers Dagneaux <andrieskd at chello.nl> wrote:
> This is what I meant to post. I re-posted some material to keep the
> context intact. I may have made a mistake.
>
> On 4/14/07, jf_wikipedia <jf_wikipedia at mac.com> wrote:
> >> Are editors "licensing their edits to WP and
> >> retaining copyright"?
>
> >Yes.  However, edits that modify text already in existence are derived
> >works and if they incorporate parts of someone else's text, Andries
> >cannot relicense.
>
> >-Matt
>
> I will remove the few and minor contributions of others and not just
> re-write in Citizendium what others wrote in Wikipedia.
>
> I am still hoping that somebody can take over editing the Wikipedia
> entry [[Sathya Baba movement]] after I was topic-banned in the [[arbcom
> case Sathya Sai Baba2]]. Please have a look at [[Sathya Baba movement]]
> and see if you can improve it. Nevertheless, I am afraid that the entry
> in Wikipedia will probably remain in its unfinished state because the
> arbcom banned the only serious contributor during its three years of
> existence.
>
> [[user:Andries]]
> Andries Krugers Dagneaux
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Kirk [mailto:gary.kirk at gmail.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 14 april 2007 20:11
> To: andrieskd at chello.nl; English Wikipedia
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Citizendium's assertions about material from
> Wikipedia
>
> This was reposted why?
>
> --
> Gary Kirk
>
>


-- 
Gary Kirk