[WikiEN-l] Original research or common sense inferral?

[Phil Sandifer]

On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Seraphim Blade wrote:

> Agreed. Allowing "straightforward interpretation" guts NOR. What is
> straightforward, and what is over the line? What if I think my
> interpretation is straightforward and you don't? And why should we be
> fulfilling (or usurping) the role of secondary sources-distinguishing
> not only what is true and factual, but is important and relevant?

I am not sure how the requirement for editorial judgment guts this or  
any other policy.

-Phil