[WikiEN-l] Fairness in Wikipedia

[Andries Krugers Dagneaux]

>The Arbitration Committee's overriding aim is not fairness.  Rather it
>is to do the best for the encyclopaedia.  This doesn't mean that
>fairness is not considered.  It just means that, when "justice" and
>the interests of the encylopaedia collide, the encyclopaedia comes
>first.
>
>Sam

I understand that. But topic banning an editor whose edits on that topic
were desribed by the arbcom as "generally responsible" and without diffs
that show disruptive editing on that topic is neither fair nor does it
help the encyclopedia. 

I will continue editing at Citizendium.

Andries