[WikiEN-l] Should anons edit Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy?
halliburton_shill at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 9 16:38:14 UTC 2006
--- Ligulem <ligulem at pobox.com> wrote:
> What's the purpose of letting non-autoconfirmed accounts
> (other than causing work for others to revert the 97%
> crap and making
> noise on watchlists)
> Why can't we simply semi-protect that? (Or do we need yet
Anons should not be editing policy. As you point out, it
contributes little (nothing that couldn't be done with a
throw-away account) and just wastes admin time. And may
even lead to the frustration that has been voiced on this
list by admins quitting wiki. Utterly pointless.
http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (now a Wikia supported site)
--spam may follow--
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the WikiEN-l