[WikiEN-l] Quitting Wikipedia and wanted you to know why.

[Parker Peters]

No.

I am asserting that polices, while they may have been well intentioned, have
the net effect of being a bureaucratic nightmare that makes it a virtual
impossibility that any course of action against an admin by a non-admin will
succeed.

That policies which were designed to safeguard admins from deliberate
harassment have become twisted into opposition of any investigation of admin
conduct whatsoever.

I'm forwarding this to en-l because I want these words to be clear to
everyone.

Cheers,
Parker.

On 10/6/06, charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com <charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>
> You are asserting that
>
> Every policy
>
> (not some but all)
>
> is designed
>
> (i.e. deliberately set up)
>
>
> to make it impossible
>
> (not inconvenient, time consuming, legalistic)
>
> for an aggrieved user to make any protest against abuse.
>
> (you say _any protest_, not just an effective protest leading to action).
>
> Well, that's hooey. Anyone can start an RfC. Show me an admin who sits on
> an RfC and I'll take action on that myself.
>
> Charles
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
> Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
>
>