[WikiEN-l] Unblock request

[abu hamza]

Hi, this is just a quick response to slimvirgins post regarding saladin.

Just a note It was slim virgin who repeatedly reverted my posts in the 
zionist page, and so his views are clearly subjective.

storng POV - I think everyone on the zionist thread has a strong POV, 
without exception.

poor research and writing skills - quoting the talmud on the three oaths, 
and citing the most acedemic and researched account of the history of zionsm 
by the itv middle east journalist Alan Hart. Is not evidence of poor 
research. Clearly this is an extremely subjective point of view

original research - this is a false accusation. There was NO original 
research, everything was references and cited. If I am wrong you need to 
give the evidence

Dodgy websites - according to whom

Use of anon IP to violate 3RR - same ipp address and browser does not 
necessarily mean it is the same user. Computers are shared and , one does 
not turn turn the internet of before someone else uses it.

copyright violations - again this is a false charge. I have asked jaygy to 
produce evidence of this copy right violations , which he should have to 
hand as this was one of the reasons for banning. So far none have been 
forthcoming

no useful edits - this is higly subjective

so as a summary there is a long list of unsubstantiated claims, most of 
which are highly subjective.
Could the reason for a request of a permanent ban be that slimvirgin is 
opposed to the factual evidence i provided on the zionist page, the same 
factual evidene that was repeatedly removed.

Wikipedia should be an online encyclopedia that provides a broad range of 
factual information on subjects, not a conformance to a certain groups POV.




>From: slimvirgin at gmail.com
>Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
>Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Unblock request
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:04:07 -0500
>
>On 5/19/06, Mark Wagner <carnildo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/19/06, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 5/19/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps a little too long, yes.
> > > > I'll see if Jaiyg can tell me more about the copyvio he claimed 
>saladin
> > > > made.
> > >
> > >  Even a copyvio doesn't justify an indefinite block here. This isn't 
>simple
> > > vandalism and there's no way we can consider this guy community 
>banned.
> >
> > Repeated, persistent copyright violations *is* grounds for an indefinite 
>block.
> >
>This is a single-issue editor who has arrived with a very strong POV
>and is determined to push it, has very poor research and writing
>skills, deletes legitimate material, inserts original research,
>misuses primary sources, uses dodgy websites as secondary sources,
>uses an anon IP to violate 3RR, violates copyright, and makes (so far
>as I can tell) no useful edits. So why is his indefinite block being
>reversed. Is Ryan prepared to mentor him?
>
>Sarah
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters