[WikiEN-l] Verifiability equating to notability

[Molu]

Ah, here we come back to our original argument. It is not possible to provide reasoning for inclusion or exclusion in this case, because the sole point here is notability. I think all MTG cards are notable, you think they are not. It is a pure-and-simple difference of perception about what Wikipedia should be. You assert the cards aren't notable, which means they should be deleted, to which I reply saying they are notable, which means they should not be deleted. No reasoning exists, no debates are possible because it's a matter of personal opinion. In this situation what avenue is left to us except counting votes to determine consensus?
   
  Molu


  On Thu, 11 May 2006 17:11:27 +1000, Mark Gallagher wrote:

>G'day Molu,

>> Please go ahead. All the information in available on the net nicely
>> catalogued, and even the images may qualify for fair use. A complete
>> database of MTG cards will be a popular section in WIkipedia. If
>> they're taken to AfD, rest assured at least I will be voting Keep.

>No, you won't, because AfD is not a vote. You may be arguing in favour 
>of keep, but rest assured that your mere presence will not be enough to 
>have any influence --- you'll have to actually provide some semblance of 
>reasoning.


>-- 
>Mark Gallagher
>"What? I can't hear you, I've got a banana on my head!"
>- Danger Mouse
		
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.