[WikiEN-l] When Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 license makes sense

[Matt Brown]

On 3/17/06, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal at inbox.org> wrote:
> My whole point is that there are exceptions.  I do disagree with you
> though that Wikimedia is the *only* corporation which has practical
> legal reasons not to license certain images under a free license,
> though.

I don't think Fastfission claimed that.

That other corporations also have good reason to not license images
freely doesn't mean we /have/ to change our policy to accept less free
images, though.

-Matt