[WikiEN-l] OK, so DRV *is* broken

[xaosflux]

Ok, I retract that, was a little overstated.  Although I've seen way to many 
items brought to DRV in the past just to have another go at them (generally 
in the case of xfd's ended in Keep).


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Gerard" <dgerard at gmail.com>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] OK, so DRV *is* broken


> On 29/12/06, xaosflux <xaosflux at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Last I checked, DRV is NOT AFD part2, and should not be involved with
>> content based decisions, just proceedural / consensus measuring ones.
>
>
> No, that's completely and insanely wrong. It is indeed supposed to
> review the decision and discussion and content and everything.
>
>
> - d.
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l