[WikiEN-l] Completely unreasonable block and behavior by admin friends of Itaqallah to win a content dispute
Jim Schuler
jim62sch at gmail.com
Wed Dec 13 10:51:11 UTC 2006
You've examined the code, eh? Probably not. As for the "possible", see
[[WP:BEANS]].
On 12/13/06, Parker Peters <onmywayoutster at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "Possible". What did the checkuser actually say, I wonder.
>
> As far as I know Checkuser (and I've examined the code), it's a yes or no
> thing. Putting forth a claim of "possible" is just a hedge being used to
> continue to beat up on this user while they are blocked and their talk
> page
> locked.
>
> I don't buy it. This whole thing doesn't pass the smell test, your conduct
> included.
>
> Parker
>
> On 12/12/06, Tariq Ab- Jo- Tu- <tariqabjotu at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > For those keeping up on this, the checkuser results have come in (see
> >
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/RunedChozo
> > ).
> > I will also copy the comment I made to [[WP:ANI]]:
> >
> > The results of the checkuser have come in with the conclusion being
> > /possible/. Nevertheless, let me make a case for why the IP address
> > in question that led to the extended block is most likely RunedChozo
> > <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:RunedChozo&action=edit
> > >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RunedChozo> • contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RunedChozo>).
> > First, note the previous request for checkuser that came back
> > confirmed. The IP address from that confirmed checkuser request
> > comes from Houston, Texas (see WHOIS lookup
> > <http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=129.7.35.126>). Both IP
> > addresses part of the more recent checkuser (the one the ended as
> > only /possible/) come from Houston as well (see WHOIS lookup one
> > <http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=70.114.237.14> and two
> > <http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=70.114.236.109>). As
> > stated already, the rhetoric from RunedChozo
> > <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:RunedChozo&action=edit
> > >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RunedChozo> • contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RunedChozo>) and
> > 70.114.237.14
> > <
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:70.114.237.14&action=edit
> >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:70.114.237.14> •
> > contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.114.237.14>)
> > are quite similar (note the reference to the talk page being
> > protected, as well as the /tool/ accusations). One editor on the
> > English Wikipedia mailing list noted that 70.114.237.14
> > <
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:70.114.237.14&action=edit
> >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:70.114.237.14> •
> > contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.114.237.14
> >)'s
> > edit times don't match up with those of RunedChozo
> > <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:RunedChozo&action=edit
> > >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RunedChozo> • contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RunedChozo>).
> > Perhaps that is correct, but it does not seem unreasonable, in my
> > opinion, for someone to be editing around 11:30pm and 12:30am,
> > especially if a user is angry and passionately wants to say
> something.
> >
> > So, it is possible that 70.114.237.14
> > <
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:70.114.237.14&action=edit
> >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:70.114.237.14> •
> > contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.114.237.14>)
> > and RunedChozo
> > <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:RunedChozo&action=edit
> > >
> > (talk <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RunedChozo> • contribs
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RunedChozo>) are
> > just both especially anti-Muslim editors who happen to both live
> > near Houston, edit similar articles, and use similar types of
> > statements. However, I am convinced, without reservation, that the
> > users are one and the same. -- *tariqabjotu
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tariqabjotu>* 03:08, 13 December
> > 2006 (UTC)
> >
> > -- Tariq Ab- Jo- Tu-
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
--
Jim
http://iacobomus.blogspot.com/
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list