[WikiEN-l] Attack blogs in WP:LIVING articles

[David Boothroyd]

Guy Chapman writes:
>On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:38:27 +0000, David Boothroyd
><david at election.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>  >I should like to clarify the issue in this dispute. The question is
>  >not whether the blog is a 'source'; it is clearly not a source for
>  >anything other than what is said on the blog. The issue is whether or
>  >not to mention it in the article
>
>Er, no.  The issue is whether to *link* it in the article.  That is
>rather different.

No, not just that. I understand your position to be that the blog is
worthy of mention in the text but not worthy of a link. However, there
are other actors in this drama, who are the people who wish to have
all mention removed. They are the people I was reverting when you
blocked me for 3RR.

PS: If you look back to my edit to [[Anne Milton]] on 5 October, and
compare it with how the article stood immediately before Twobells'
contribution, where does that leave your still unproven theory that
the reason I want the blog mentioned is that I have a political
animus against Anne Milton? The relevant diff is
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anne_Milton&diff=79621472&oldid=79056731
-- 
David Boothroyd - http://www.election.demon.co.uk
david at election.demon.co.uk (home)
dboothroyd at westminster.gov.uk (council)