[WikiEN-l] LS Studio and pro-pedophilia pov

[Guy Chapman aka JzG]

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:56:46 -0500, you wrote:

>First, remove all unverifiable statements from the article.  Insist
>firmly on the talk page that nothing goes back into the article without
>a solid site to a mainstream publication.
>Second, after a couple of weeks of demonstrating that there is therefore
>nothing to be said, AfD would be appropriate and likely to succeed.

You forget - this is a sex-related article.  On AfD, the fact that it
scores thousands of Google hits will mean that it is "notable" and
therefore it will be kept.  The lack of content will be swiftly
reverted by reference to those Google hits. 

That's what happened to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_steamer
anyway.  We now have all the "popular culture" cruft back in there,
and still absolutely no reliable sources.  Unless you count the entry
in the online dictionary of sex added by the well-known and trusted
user "Anonymous", which some people apparently do.
Guy (JzG)
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG