[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

[Sean Barrett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Alexander Russell stated for the record:

> Not if we wrote it properly. The only way a policy can be 'gamed' if it
> is written ambiguously or in a way that is down to interpretation (e.g.
> CSD T1 - what exactly 'divisive' means is down to the individual, and
> two people acting in good faith can interpret it in completely different
> ways). If, for example, we simply wrote it as:
> 
> Any image depicting children engaged in sexual intercourse or posing
> with sex toys
> 
> There is nothing in that (that I can see) which could possibly be
> 'gamed' or misinterpreted.
> 
> Cynical

A pair of one-inch diameter metal balls.  Sex toy, or parts of a bearing?

- --
 Sean Barrett     | We completely deny the allegations, and
 sean at epoptic.org | we're trying to identify the alligators.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEN+xXMAt1wyd9d+URAnv6AKCFLEK0jHaNwUOwCLYTFRMXAKKk9QCbBKdl
yOOkMpWLHAct05WLLaTd+JY=
=twe1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----