[WikiEN-l] How many Arbitrators should we have?

[steve v]

Why? Arbcom largely decides how to handle personality
disputes, and in the process must deal somewhat with
applications of principle -neutrality being first
among them. 

It seems to be popular belief that the Arbcom is
understaffed relative to Wikipedia size, anyway. As a
consequence, it seems to only thinly treat its duty to
be treat each specific point/issue/claim, and in turn
this means that its rulings offer only a decree, and
show little about the thinking process. Of course,
things are open to discussion, but IAC, NPOV is clear
enough for a committee to deal with regard to its
application to certain points, and is separate from
personality issues. 

Growth often means diversification.

SV



--- Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/5/05, steve v <vertigosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Would this "lower court filter" resemble a
> > Wikipedia:NPOV committee?
> >
> > SV
> 
> At this time, I'm opposed to either ArbCom or any
> body subordinate to
> it being involved deciding content disputes.
> 
> Kelly
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com