[WikiEN-l] How many Arbitrators should we have?

[steve v]

Would this "lower court filter" resemble a
Wikipedia:NPOV committee? 

SV

--- Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/5/05, Carbonite <carbonite.wp at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >  In my opinion, it would also be beneficial to
> create panels of 5-7
> > arbitrators so that the ArbCom could multi-task.
> Each panel would only
> > handle a few cases at a time instead of the entire
> ArbCom having to examine
> > the evidence of every open case. This might also
> help reduce the burnout
> > that's inevitable when every arbitrator must hear
> every case.
> >  Carbonite
> 
> I would prefer to keep the ArbCom at its current
> size (or close to it)
> and establish lower courts to filter off the
> relatively easy stuff and
> to organize the cases into a form so that when they
> do appeal the
> ArbCom doesn't have to waste as much time
> marshalling the case.
> 
> A few Arbitration Assistants would not be remiss,
> either.
> 
> Kelly
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com