[WikiEN-l] Arbitration Commitee Seeking Comment

[Sean Barrett]

Tony Sidaway stated for the record:

> steven l. rubenstein said:
> 
>>David, this is an issue I and others have raised repeatedly over the
>>past  years: many irresolvable disputes center on content, and
>>Wikipedia needs a  mechanism for dealing with these content-based
>>disputes.
> 
> 
> Why?  If the disputes are irresolvable, why is it necessary to bring in a
> deus ex machina to declare a resolution?  Isn't it just more honest to
> leave the irresolvable unresolved?  I find this, the current way, quite
> satisfactory and if the arbcom really is accepting cases that are in the
> realm of content disputes then they should simply be more parsimonious in
> the kind of dispute they accept.

No dispute is irresolvable once you get past that archaic idea of NPOV 
and accept OTPOV -- the One True Point of View.

-- 
  Sean Barrett     | These go to eleven. It's one louder, isn't
  sean at epoptic.com | it? It's not ten. --Nigel of Spinal Tap