[WikiEN-l] Creationism is not horse-shit, it's pseudo-science
Ray Saintonge
saintonge at telus.net
Fri Jul 22 00:28:45 UTC 2005
Sam Korn wrote:
>Jimmy Wales wrote:
>
>
>>strictly limited. If we had a category of "things which are widely
>>regarded, by scientists and others of a similar bent, as being less than
>>fully established science, but which are often, by those who are not
>>scientists, put forward as if they were science" then we'd have less
>>trouble, I think.
>>
>>
>How about "disputed science" or "disputed scientific theories"?
>
Currently we have [[List of alternative, speculative and disputed
theories]]. I've waltzed around this topic for the last three years,
and I'm convinced that that's about as close as we'll ever get to consensus.
Ec
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list