[WikiEN-l] Re: Copyright, images and the voicing of doubt

[Anthere]

since we are on the copyright topic, what is currently done with 
articles where there is a certainty of copyright but are not new, or 
even worse, have been edited since then ?

Are they reverted ?
Or, is the cp content just removed ?
Or is it commonly practiced to remove in the history of the article the 
place where it is under copyright to avoid cp to be in history ?

Anthere


Tony Sidaway a écrit:
> What is the policy on copyrights that are disputed on suspicion?
> 
> Suppose there exists a photograph donated under GFDL and the uploader says
> that it was produced by him.
> Is the assertion of doubt by a third party _alone_ reason to post this as
> a "possible" copyright violation and recommend it for deletion on that
> basis?
> I'm not talking about the case where circumstantial evidence or other
> evidence exists to suggest that the image is a copyright violation.  Only
> that someone has voiced the possibility that it is one.