[WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia

Tue Aug 23 01:35:54 UTC 2005

JAY JG wrote:

> Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish 
> douchebag, and he seems omnipresent."  That one really hurt.  
> Omnipresent?  Is that a euphemism for fat?

Come now, it's an attribute of deity (depending on one's theological 
position), and you should be flattered that they recognize your natural 
superiority.

--Michael Snow

> :-O
>
> Jay.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
> From:
> Arkady Rose <arkady at arkady.org.uk>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:46:03 +0100
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>
>
>JAY JG wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of Wikipedia; it turns out
>>the chief Jew is Jimbo himself:
>>[http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311]  They also
>>appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup
>>IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to
>>get around blocks.
>>
>>Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish
>>douchebag, and he seems omnipresent."  That one really hurt. 
>>Omnipresent?  Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
>>    
>>
>
>What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to
>"Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really
>is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused
>of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the
>Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
>
>Of course that would then lead to questions of whether it's a
>Gardnerian, Alexandrian, Lycian or Eclectiv coven - but hey, these are
>neo-nazis who don't let a little thing like religious accuracy get in
>their way. We're all devil worshippers and Jimbo sacrifices babies at
>the clambake every third Tuesday of the month, right?
>
>;-)
>
>- Arkady (who happens to be Wiccan....)
>
>  
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] An admin misused his privilages to block me...
> From:
> MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic at gmail.com>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:58:49 +0200
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
>
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
>
>
>I've seen a lot of vandalism coming from schools and universities, but
>I've yet to see vandalism from the uni I attend.
>
>--Mgm
>
>  
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] An admin misused his privilages to block me...
> From:
> Theresa Knott <theresaknott at gmail.com>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:08:06 +0100
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
>
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
>
>
>On 8/22/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I've seen a lot of vandalism coming from schools and universities, but
>>I've yet to see vandalism from the uni I attend.
>>    
>>
>
>Possible conclusions
>
>Students from your university are exceptionally well behaved.
>Your university is very small.
>No one from your university bothers to do research on the web and so
>has never come across wikipedia. (except you)
>Everyone from your university (except you of course) is too stupid to
>work out that "edit this page" means they can edit a page.
>Your university is not connected to the Internet.
>
>Takes yer pick ;-)
>
>Theresa
>
>  
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
> From:
> "Zachary Harden" <zscout370 at hotmail.com>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:20:20 +0000
> To:
> wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
>
> To:
> wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
>
>
> Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of 
> tech skills, nor from lack of users. It is lack of dough. From looking 
> at what Wikimedia needs to raise and see how much they spend on just 
> running the sites, I do not think Stormfront would have enough dough 
> to pull it off. And most companies will probably not waste their time 
> or money dealing with neo-Nazis. It's very, very un-PC for companies 
> to deal with fascists.
>
> Regards,
>
> Zachary Harden
>
>> From: Arkady Rose <arkady at arkady.org.uk>
>> Reply-To: arkady at arkady.org.uk,English Wikipedia 
>> <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
>> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:46:03 +0100
>>
>> JAY JG wrote:
>>
>> > Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of Wikipedia; it turns out
>> > the chief Jew is Jimbo himself:
>> > [http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311]  They also
>> > appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup
>> > IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to
>> > get around blocks.
>> >
>> > Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish
>> > douchebag, and he seems omnipresent."  That one really hurt.
>> > Omnipresent?  Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
>>
>> What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to
>> "Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really
>> is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused
>> of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the
>> Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
>>
>> Of course that would then lead to questions of whether it's a
>> Gardnerian, Alexandrian, Lycian or Eclectiv coven - but hey, these are
>> neo-nazis who don't let a little thing like religious accuracy get in
>> their way. We're all devil worshippers and Jimbo sacrifices babies at
>> the clambake every third Tuesday of the month, right?
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> - Arkady (who happens to be Wiccan....)
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] Unnecessary and improper article dating
> From:
> Delirium <delirium at hackish.org>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:21:33 -0400
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>
> To:
> English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>
>
> steve v wrote:
>
>> The Iraq War article has recently been formed to
>> consolodate the term under something a bit more
>> substantive than a disambiguation. There remains the
>> issue of unnecessary dating of events, where such
>> events are uniquely enough referenced and titled to
>> warrant more common terms. There are thousands of
>> cases where we use the common term instead of a more
>> official term, so why then is there a persistence in
>> using a unique standard using titles prefaced with a
>> date?  
>>
> The problem is that it isn't always agreed when something is "uniquely 
> enough referenced and titled to warrant more common terms", especially 
> taking a historical view.  Many news organizations today speak of the 
> "London terrorist attacks", for example, but obviously Wikipedia needs 
> to use a more specific article title since there have been multiple 
> London terrorist attacks over the years.
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
> From:
> "JAY JG" <jayjg at hotmail.com>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:27:48 -0400
> To:
> wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
>
> To:
> wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
>
>
>> From: "Zachary Harden" <zscout370 at hotmail.com>
>>
>> Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of 
>> tech skills, nor from lack of users.
>
>
> I think it would be more likely to fail due to the many obvious 
> failings of its proponents.  See, for example, the posts of 
> JohnJoyTree in that thread, the only one there who appears to have a 
> clue.
>
> Jay.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
> From:
> Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.org>
> Date:
> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:32:31 -0700
> To:
> arkady at arkady.org.uk, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>
> To:
> arkady at arkady.org.uk, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>
>
> Arkady Rose stated for the record:
>
>> What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to
>> "Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really
>> is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused
>> of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the
>> Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
>
>
> There are twelve of us on the ArbComm, and Jimbo makes thirt-- oh, 
> wait, I shouldn't have said that.  THERE ARE NO SECRET MEMBERS OF THE 
> CABAL. FNORD.
>
> Crap.  Now I'm going to have to use the Orbital Mind Control Lasers to 
> erase their knowledge of the Secret 33rd-Degree Arbiters....
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>  
>