[WikiEN-l] Re: Can we ban 172 now? And VV too!

[Ray Saintonge]

Please!  Is it necessary to work so hard to find the worst in people?  
Frezing a revert war and punishing the combatants will only mean that 
there is a 50-50 chance that the article will be frozen in the "right" 
place.  I see Fred's posting as an attempt to solve the problem in at 
least one article.  It may leave many other articles unresolved, but it 
IS progress. 

You seem to be more concerned with fanning the flames, and taking 
positions based on who is writing rather than what is written.

Ec

Rick wrote:

>The issue is not editing from a POV, it's massive reverting over and over again.
> 
>RickK
>
>Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote:
>I think we have beat on Abe, 172, enough, after all I think he is in the
>right in the Augusto Pinochet article, which is the one before the
>arbitration committee. I've never looked closely at VV but he seems quite
>reluctant to search for and evaluate the evidence in that matter.
>
>Under existing Wikipedia rules, editing from a point of view is subject to
>correction by the editing process, not grounds for banning.
>  
>